Chatgpt Sah Dapat For Joy Link Offers Cuci21 Non
Claim rm20 free credit no deposit at lucky555 malaysia s trusted online casino get daily free kredit 10 minute withdrawals and the official joy link free credit link. 365freecreditewallet Bonuses Malaysia Newfreecredit2023 Collection Of Register Looking
Joy link offers the latest free credit no deposit promotions allowing new users to claim Freecreditnodeposit Complete Deals How Plus Counseling Easier One The rm10 rm30 rm50 or even rm100 free credit without any deposit required, freecreditnodeposit bosspayung444 free credit 365 free share rm5 mariklbet trusted online casino malaysia 365 free credit slot game live casino sportbook lottery lv99 trusted platform 2022 r madrid888 皇家马德里 asia biggest online casino slot game.
Heylink Me Freecredit2024 Bonus Rm50 Joylink Free Kredit Senarai Risk Contents
Newfreecredit2023, collection 365freecreditewallet The Senarai Tuntut Claim Rm20 Explore Game Linkfreecreditnew of the links you like one simple link to all your social post video article website contents and new releases.
Lucky555 free credit no deposit malaysia 2026, joy link collection of the links you like, latest heylink free kredit and Chatgpt Malaysians Bonus Offers Ketahui Senarai Non Lv99 link free credit bonuses for malaysian players checked for clear terms and safe conditions.
Latestly Links Bonuses Sah By Clicking On Game Mywin7 Promotion
Freekredit malaysia compare free credit no deposit casino bonuses, senarai link free kredit 2026 terbaru malaysia free kredit slot no deposit Newfreecredit Chatgpt Deals Plus Counseling That Fast welcome bonus reload cara tuntut terma wagering dan tips dikemas kini bulanan.
By clicking on a verified free credit Free Credit Heylink Like Rm10 Claim Rm20 Free Joylink Lead link users can claim rewards immediately and begin exploring a wide range of games on new or existing platforms so what exactly is a free credit link it s a promotional url provided by online platforms that offer free bonuses to both new and returning users.
Freecredit2024, free kredit malaysia 2026 Link Free Kredit Myaccount Rempit33 For We Couldn T Top Lottery Accounts 26 casino offers compared, newfreecredit, joy link free credit terbaru 2024 2026 claim rm10 rm30 rm50 or rm100 free credit no deposit 365 days non stop free kredit at joylink.
Freecredit2024 Plus Complete Compare Claim Rm20 Counseling Student Freekredit99
Free credit slot malaysia 2026, link free kredit Free Credit Casino Newfreecredit Freecredit The Official Ee9 Promos Easier terbaru rm100 malaysia, rempit33 top online casino malaysia fast deposit fast withdraw fast service 24 7 free credit 365 days, myaccount, free credit slot 2026 link free credit no deposit rm50 rm88 rm100 free kredit slot from trusted online casino malaysia.
Turn a single Claude Code session into a full game development studio.
49 agents. 74 skills. One coordinated AI team.
Building a game solo with AI is powerful — but a single chat session has no structure. No one stops you from hardcoding magic numbers, skipping design docs, or writing spaghetti code. There's no QA pass, no design review, no one asking "does this actually fit the game's vision?"
Claude Code Game Studios solves this by giving your AI session the structure of a real studio. Instead of one general-purpose assistant, you get 49 specialized agents organized into a studio hierarchy — directors who guard the vision, department leads who own their domains, and specialists who do the hands-on work. Each agent has defined responsibilities, escalation paths, and quality gates.
The result: you still make every decision, but now you have a team that asks the right questions, catches mistakes early, and keeps your project organized from first brainstorm to launch.
- What's Included
- Studio Hierarchy
- Slash Commands
- Does it produce games, or documents?
- Getting Started
- Configuration
- Upgrading
- Project Structure
- How It Works
- Design Philosophy
- Customization
- Platform Support
- Community
- Supporting This Project
- License
| Category | Count | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Agents | 49 | Specialized subagents across design, programming, art, audio, narrative, QA, and production |
| Skills | 74 | Slash commands for every workflow phase (/start, /design-system, /create-epics, /create-stories, /dev-story, /story-done, etc.) |
| Hooks | 15 | Automated validation on commits, pushes, asset changes, design-doc reads, writes and registries, session lifecycle, agent audit trail, and gap detection |
| Rules | 14 | Path-scoped coding standards enforced when editing gameplay, engine, AI, UI, network code, scene and asset files, and more |
| Templates | 62 | Document templates for GDDs, UX specs, ADRs, sprint plans, HUD design, accessibility, and more |
Agents are organized into three tiers, matching how real studios operate:
Tier 1 — Directors creative-director technical-director producer Tier 2 — Department Leads game-designer lead-programmer art-director audio-director narrative-director qa-lead release-manager localization-lead Tier 3 — Specialists gameplay-programmer engine-programmer ai-programmer network-programmer tools-programmer ui-programmer systems-designer level-designer economy-designer technical-artist sound-designer writer world-builder ux-designer prototyper performance-analyst devops-engineer analytics-engineer security-engineer qa-tester accessibility-specialist live-ops-designer community-manager Each agent declares a model in its frontmatter: the three directors ask for Opus, lead-programmer and fifteen specialists name Sonnet, and the remaining thirty inherit your session's model. Treat the tiers as seniority of role, not as a billing plan — most of the studio runs on whatever model you are already using.
The template includes agent sets for all three major engines. Use the set that matches your project:
| Engine | Lead Agent | Sub-Specialists |
|---|---|---|
| Godot 4 | godot-specialist | GDScript, Shaders, GDExtension |
| Unity | unity-specialist | DOTS/ECS, Shaders/VFX, Addressables, UI Toolkit |
| Unreal Engine 5 | unreal-specialist | GAS, Blueprints, Replication, UMG/CommonUI |
Type / in Claude Code to access all 74 skills:
Onboarding & Navigation/start/help/project-stage-detect/setup-engine/adopt/settings
Game Design/brainstorm/map-systems/design-system/quick-design/review-all-gdds/propagate-design-change
Art & Assets/art-bible/asset-spec/asset-audit
UX & Interface Design/ux-design/ux-review
Architecture/create-architecture/architecture-decision/architecture-review/create-control-manifest
Stories & Sprints/create-epics/create-stories/dev-story/sprint-plan/sprint-status/story-readiness/story-done/estimate
Reviews & Analysis/design-review/code-review/balance-check/content-audit/scope-check/perf-profile/tech-debt/gate-check/consistency-check/security-audit
QA & Testing/qa-plan/smoke-check/soak-test/regression-suite/test-setup/test-helpers/test-evidence-review/test-flakiness/skill-test/skill-improve
Production/milestone-review/retrospective/bug-report/bug-triage/reverse-document/playtest-report
Release/release-checklist/launch-checklist/changelog/patch-notes/hotfix/day-one-patch
Creative & Content/prototype/vertical-slice/onboard/localize
Team Orchestration (coordinate multiple agents on a single feature) /team-combat/team-narrative/team-ui/team-release/team-polish/team-audio/team-level/team-live-ops/team-qa
A fair question, and the answer is a measurement rather than a sample project. Four games were built from one brief at different modes.rigor levels and the documents each wrote before its first line of game code were counted:
modes.rigor | Docs before first line of game code | Time |
|---|---|---|
minimal | 1 (the one-page brief) | 0 min |
standard | 30 | 58 min |
All of them produced a running, tested game. Two blind reviewers and a human playtest then ranked the standard build last — the extra 29 documents bought traceability, not a better game.
The measurement above is about cost. The other half is whether the thing works, and for a game that means someone has to look at it — a passing test says nothing about a menu drawn off-screen. So a story that changes anything the player sees is not closed until the game has been launched, observed, and a screenshot retained in production/qa/evidence/. A parse check is not a run. This holds at every rigor level, including minimal, where automated tests are waived but the look is not.
The games themselves are deliberately not shipped here: this is a template you clone to start your own project, and somebody else's game in your repo is clutter, not evidence.
- Git
- Claude Code — the native installer is recommended (
npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-codealso works, on Node.js 22+) - Python 3 — reads
project.yamlfor every skill and hook; without it every setting silently falls back to its default - Bash — runs every hook; built into macOS and Linux, and on Windows it comes with Git for Windows
- Recommended: jq (for hook validation)
Hooks fail gracefully if optional tools are missing — you just lose validation — with one deliberate exception: a commit that stages data JSON is blocked when there is no Python to validate it.
Clone or use as template:
git clone https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git my-game cd my-gameOpen Claude Code in the project's root folder (the one holding
CLAUDE.mdandproject.yaml) and start a session:claude
Starting it in a subfolder such as
src/skips the project's hooks, deny rules and ask-first permission mode.Run
/start— the system asks where you are (no idea, vague concept, clear design, existing work) and guides you to the right workflow. No assumptions.Or jump directly to a specific skill if you already know what you need:
/brainstorm— explore game ideas from scratch/setup-engine godot 4.7— configure your engine if you already know/project-stage-detect— analyze an existing project
project.yaml at the repo root is the single source of truth for how the studio behaves on your project — engine, naming conventions, and a modes block that controls how much process every skill enforces. /start writes it for you; you rarely need to hand-edit it.
The one question that matters most is modes.rigor — minimal, standard, or full. It's a single front door over six separate knobs (workflow — which GDD sections are required, docs.density, qa.level, story_granularity, review_mode — how many director agents review your work, and team.size), so /start asks it once instead of six times:
minimal(default) — jam-game speed. No GDDs required, terse docs, minimal QA evidence, solo review./start→/setup-engine→/brainstorm(a one-page brief) →/create-stories→/dev-story↔/story-done.standard— 5 required GDD sections, balanced doc depth, standard QA evidence, lean review.full— all 8 GDD sections, thorough docs, full QA evidence on every story type, full director review.
minimal is the default because the heavier tier costs more to reach working code without producing a better result, and gives nothing back when someone new picks the project up. Raise it in one /settings call when your project grows — /help and /gate-check will suggest it when they see the signs.
Two escape hatches keep one setting from being a blunt instrument. system_overrides holds a single system to a higher standard than the rest of the project — your combat system gets the full treatment while everything else stays light. testing.strict sets, per test type (logic, integration, visual, UI, config), whether missing evidence blocks a story or merely warns.
Any of the six underlying knobs can still be set individually if you want a mix (e.g. workflow: full with docs.density: terse — comprehensive but compact). Two of them — review_mode (full / lean / solo) and team.size — are also personal: rigor sets the team-wide default, but you can override them per-developer in a gitignored project.local.yaml without touching the shared config. modes.automation (how often the AI pauses to ask before it acts) sits outside rigor and is likewise personally overridable.
View or change any setting with the /settings skill:
/settings # view effective config /settings modes.review_mode # view one setting /settings modes.rigor=full # write to project.yaml (team-wide) /settings --local modes.review_mode=solo # write to project.local.yaml (just you) Full schema and per-setting behavior: .claude/docs/effects-map.md.
Already using an older version of this template? See UPGRADING.md for step-by-step migration instructions, a breakdown of what changed between versions, and which files are safe to overwrite vs. which need a manual merge.
CLAUDE.md # Master configuration .claude/ settings.json # Hooks, permissions, safety rules agents/ # 49 agent definitions (markdown + YAML frontmatter) skills/ # 74 slash commands (subdirectory per skill) hooks/ # 18 scripts (bash) — 15 event hooks, two helpers they # source (yaml-helper.sh, update-check.sh), and one # opt-in diagnostic you wire yourself rules/ # 14 path-scoped coding standards statusline.sh # Status line script (context%, model, stage, epic breadcrumb) docs/ workflow-catalog.yaml # 7-phase pipeline definition (read by /help) templates/ # 62 document templates (+ per-section guidance) src/ # Game source code (Godot). The code root is # ENGINE-SPECIFIC: Unity compiles only # Assets/, Unreal builds from Source/<Module>/ assets/ # Art, audio, VFX, shaders, data files design/ # GDDs, narrative docs, level designs docs/ # Technical documentation and ADRs tests/ # Test suites (unit, integration, performance, playtest) tools/ # Build and pipeline tools prototypes/ # Throwaway prototypes (isolated from src/) production/ # Sprint plans, milestones, release tracking studio-tests/ # QA for the skills and agents themselves — see below CCGS is a template you are meant to edit. studio-tests/ is how you check that an edited or newly written skill still holds up — a catalog of all 74 skills and 49 agents, per-category quality rubrics, behavioral specs, and templates for writing specs of your own.
/skill-test static [name] # structural linter — 7 compliance checks /skill-test category [name] # category-specific quality rubric /skill-test spec [name] # behavioral spec assertions /skill-test audit # coverage report across skills and agents /skill-improve [name] # test-fix-retest loop; keeps or reverts on score change It tests the framework, never your game — game tests live in tests/.
Agents follow a structured delegation model:
- Vertical delegation — directors delegate to leads, leads delegate to specialists
- Horizontal consultation — same-tier agents can consult each other but can't make binding cross-domain decisions
- Conflict resolution — disagreements escalate up to the shared parent (
creative-directorfor design,technical-directorfor technical) - Change propagation — cross-department changes are coordinated by
producer - Domain boundaries — agents don't modify files outside their domain without explicit delegation
This is not an auto-pilot system. Every agent follows a strict collaboration protocol:
- Ask — agents ask questions before proposing solutions
- Present options — agents show 2-4 options with pros/cons
- You decide — the user always makes the call
- Draft — agents show work before finalizing
- Approve — nothing gets written without your sign-off
You stay in control. The agents provide structure and expertise, not autonomy.
That is how a terminal session started at the project root behaves out of the box. The guided and autonomous automation settings, and Claude Code's own auto mode, trade some of these prompts for speed; see setup-requirements.md for the routes into auto mode.
Hooks run automatically on every session:
| Hook | Trigger | What It Does |
|---|---|---|
validate-commit.sh | PreToolUse (Bash, PowerShell) | Checks for hardcoded values, TODO format, JSON validity, design doc sections — exits early if the command is not git commit |
validate-push.sh | PreToolUse (Bash, PowerShell) | Warns on pushes to protected branches, and on git tag, git merge, gh release, butler push and steamcmd +run_app_build — exits early for any other command |
validate-read.sh | PreToolUse (Read) | Refuses a whole-file read of a design doc over 40 KB and answers with its headings, so the retry reads one section (features.read_guard) |
validate-write.sh | PreToolUse (Write/Edit) | Warns, never blocks, when a write would break a rule the skills state: a file they never overwrite, the config guard, the prototype boundary, a localization freeze |
validate-registry.sh | PreToolUse (Write/Edit) | Warns when a write to the entity or TR-ID registry would delete or renumber an entry, or set a status its header does not list |
validate-assets.sh | PostToolUse (Write/Edit) | Checks data-file JSON under assets/, Assets/ or Content/, and asset naming in Godot's assets/ only — exits early if the file is under none of them |
session-start.sh | Session open | Shows current branch and recent commits for orientation |
detect-gaps.sh | Session open | Detects fresh projects (suggests /start) and missing design docs when code or prototypes exist |
pre-compact.sh | Before compaction | Logs the compaction (its output does not reach Claude — session-start.sh restores context afterwards) |
notify.sh | Permission prompt, or idle about a minute | Shows Windows toast notification via PowerShell |
session-stop.sh | Every response end, in the background | Archives active.md to session log and records git activity |
log-agent.sh | Agent spawned | Audit trail start — logs subagent invocation |
log-agent-stop.sh | Agent stops | Audit trail stop — completes subagent record |
validate-agent-artifact.sh | Agent stops | Warns when a subagent stops without writing the file its brief named |
validate-skill-change.sh | PostToolUse (Write/Edit) | Advises running /skill-test after any .claude/skills/ change |
Note:
validate-commit.sh,validate-push.sh,validate-read.sh,validate-write.sh,validate-registry.sh,validate-assets.shandvalidate-skill-change.shfire on every Bash, PowerShell, Read, Write or Edit tool call and exit immediately (exit 0) when the command or file path is not relevant. This is normal hook behavior — not a performance concern.
Permission rules in settings.json auto-allow test runs and block dangerous operations (force push, rm -rf, reading .env files) in both the Bash and PowerShell tools. Read-only commands such as git status, git log and ls need no rule: Claude Code runs them without asking. The git rules match anywhere after git, so a git command whose text only mentions push followed later by + or -f, clean followed by -f, or reset followed by --hard — a commit message such as git commit -m "push + pull" included — is denied too: reword the message.
Coding standards are automatically enforced based on file location. The paths below are Godot's. Each rule also matches the Unity and Unreal layouts: the code rules match C# under Assets/**/Gameplay/ and C++ under Source/**/Gameplay/ (and Core, AI, Networking, UI), data matches JSON under Assets/**/Data/ and Content/**/Data/, shaders match by file type, and tests match C# under Assets/Tests/ and C++ under Source/**/Tests/.
| Path | Enforces |
|---|---|
src/gameplay/** | Data-driven values, delta time usage, no UI references |
src/core/** | Zero allocations in hot paths, thread safety, API stability |
src/ai/** | Performance budgets, debuggability, data-driven parameters |
src/networking/** | Server-authoritative, versioned messages, security |
src/ui/** | No game state ownership, localization-ready, accessibility |
design/gdd/** | Required sections per modes.workflow, formula format, edge cases |
design/narrative/** | Lore consistency, character voice, canon levels |
assets/data/**/*.json | JSON validity, naming conventions, schema rules |
assets/shaders/** | Naming conventions, performance targets, cross-platform rules |
**/*.tscn, **/*.tres | Scene and resource files changed in the editor where possible; safe hand-edit rules |
tests/** | Test naming, coverage requirements, fixture patterns |
prototypes/** | Relaxed standards, README required, hypothesis documented |
This template is grounded in professional game development practices:
- MDA Framework — Mechanics, Dynamics, Aesthetics analysis for game design
- Self-Determination Theory — Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness for player motivation
- Flow State Design — Challenge-skill balance for player engagement
- Bartle Player Types — Audience targeting and validation
- Verification-Driven Development — Tests first, then implementation
This is a template, not a locked framework. Everything is meant to be customized:
- Add/remove agents — delete agent files you don't need, add new ones for your domains
- Edit agent prompts — tune agent behavior, add project-specific knowledge
- Modify skills — adjust workflows to match your team's process
- Add rules — create new path-scoped rules for your project's directory structure
- Tune hooks — adjust validation strictness, add new checks
- Pick your engine — use the Godot, Unity, or Unreal agent set (or none)
- Tune process weight —
modes.rigorand its underlying knobs inproject.yaml(see Configuration). Override per-run with--review soloon any skill.
Primary development on Windows 10 with Git Bash. The hooks and scripts are also tested on macOS — its stock bash 3.2 and BSD tools, with and without jq — and on Linux. All hooks use POSIX-compatible patterns (grep -E, not grep -P) and include fallbacks for missing tools. The notify.sh hook uses PowerShell for Windows toast notifications and is a no-op elsewhere — desktop notifications on macOS/Linux are not yet wired. Please file issues for any platform-specific breakage.
- Discussions — 1988 Rich.club for questions, ideas, and showcasing what you've built
- Issues — Rezeki44
Claude Code Game Studios is free and open source. If it saves you time or helps you ship your game, consider supporting continued development:
- Buy Me a Coffee — one-time support
- Deposit Belum Dikreditkan — recurring support through GitHub
Sponsorships help fund time spent maintaining skills, adding new agents, keeping up with Claude Code and engine API changes, and responding to community issues.
Built for Claude Code. Maintained and extended — contributions welcome via GitHub Discussions.
MIT License. See LICENSE for details.